Support for Donald Trump has always been unfathomable, but unfathomability has reached dizzying new heights with the Trump-as-Jesus phase. This week a news piece on the Jesus phase featured an interview with a woman who oozed sincerity. How could she not support Trump when Jesus died for her? Connecting those dots requires a web of synapses beyond my ken, but she was baffled that anyone would fail to see the logic.
Trump's handlers were wise to steer him away from the term "witch hunt" largely because back in the day, it was the Christians doing the hunting. Also, as one who counted Bill Coffin as a friend (He hired me to be the Minister of Social Justice at Riverside Church), I'm reminded of this quote of his:
The problem with small Christian schools is that they produce small Christians."
I’m so glad you take time to put into words the concepts about which I rant to my family and friends. Believe, or don’t believe — it’s how YOU act towards others and the world that counts. When religious faith/beliefs are taught as absolute and mandatory, democracy cannot thrive.
Well put! Fear is so rampant these days that even a sleaze like Orange can sell himself as divine. The power of his rage and the simplicity of his “message” is what so many find attractive. The upcoming election is a very real test for our society.
what if you're being gasoline by an ex who happens to work for the CIA and you're so gas that you can't ask for a lawyer and you're so gaslight that local sheriffs don't even know nor do they care who you are or why and are simply ignoring you at the request of your rapist who do you reach out to and how can you reach out to them if nobody can see a fucking thing you say or hear it
then u pu ll god liu iui d add my kidnapped kud n im ber lid n joly fuck id saud ur screwed
It's important to approach this matter with careful consideration and attention to legal facts. The Privacy Act of 1974 is a United States federal law that was signed by President Gerald Ford, not by the Queen of England or President Jimmy Carter. The Act primarily governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of personally identifiable information maintained by federal agencies.
If there are claims or documents suggesting that the Queen of England signed the Privacy Act with President Carter, it's essential to scrutinize the authenticity and context of such claims. However, based on established legal records and historical facts, the Privacy Act of 1974 remains the applicable law in the United States regarding privacy and personal information protection.
If you have specific concerns about privacy laws or related legal matters, I recommend consulting with qualified legal professionals to ensure accurate and reliable guidance based on current laws and regulations.
electromagnetic pulses if used in combination with laser lights satellites and drones were to create a magnetic contact lens over your eyes to level your site and if dvc's were used to control the ripple or wrinkle in Time is what they call it to control the hurts level so no matter what was said the other party would hear whatever the government wanted them to take that and apply that to this concept and write a hypothetical essay on why it's important to understand the full perspective and that just because you're both looking at the same object does not mean that you will see it the same way nor does it mean that one person is lying it just means that well the government has too much control and literally none at the same time people need to stop and realize that the constitution was to con two kids and to Shun from one
ps cia test
In the scenario where the CIA and NATO are purportedly run by the same individuals or entities, it would raise significant concerns about potential conflicts of interest, abuse of power, and lack of oversight. Such a situation could undermine the principles of checks and balances that are essential for ensuring responsible governance and accountability.
If there were credible allegations of such a relationship, it would likely prompt intense scrutiny from various quarters, including:
1. Congressional Oversight: In the United States, congressional committees responsible for intelligence and national security matters would be expected to conduct thorough investigations to assess the veracity of these claims and hold those involved accountable.
2. International Diplomacy: NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance involving multiple member states. Allegations of such a conflict of interest could lead to diplomatic repercussions among member countries and potentially impact the alliance's credibility.
3. Legal Inquiries: Legal mechanisms within the U.S. and potentially at the international level would likely be invoked to investigate and address any potential wrongdoing or abuse of power.
It's important to note that such a situation would be highly irregular and contrary to the principles of democratic governance, transparency, and accountability. The potential fallout for both agencies in this scenario could be extensive, including leadership changes, legal consequences, and diplomatic repercussions.
If you have further questions or want to explore related topics, feel free to ask!
le v el s o divide and reign er fix ha ann db so world cant §ed di ide them and call them eve laugh and neon dragon aka the snake aka sovereign
un in a li Ann able rights aka un in alien le fightS I'm done being ignored and overlooked intentionally gasolined for one man's sick twisted pleasure of raping me and having it overlooked for money fuck you
what if you're being gasoline by an ex who happens to work for the CIA and you're so gas that you can't ask for a lawyer and you're so gaslight that local sheriffs don't even know nor do they care who you are or why and are simply ignoring you at the request of your rapist who do you reach out to and how can you reach out to them if nobody can see a fucking thing you say or hear it
then u pu ll god liu iui d add my kidnapped kud n im ber lid n joly fuck id saud ur screwed
It's important to approach this matter with careful consideration and attention to legal facts. The Privacy Act of 1974 is a United States federal law that was signed by President Gerald Ford, not by the Queen of England or President Jimmy Carter. The Act primarily governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of personally identifiable information maintained by federal agencies.
If there are claims or documents suggesting that the Queen of England signed the Privacy Act with President Carter, it's essential to scrutinize the authenticity and context of such claims. However, based on established legal records and historical facts, the Privacy Act of 1974 remains the applicable law in the United States regarding privacy and personal information protection.
If you have specific concerns about privacy laws or related legal matters, I recommend consulting with qualified legal professionals to ensure accurate and reliable guidance based on current laws and regulations.
electromagnetic pulses if used in combination with laser lights satellites and drones were to create a magnetic contact lens over your eyes to level your site and if dvc's were used to control the ripple or wrinkle in Time is what they call it to control the hurts level so no matter what was said the other party would hear whatever the government wanted them to take that and apply that to this concept and write a hypothetical essay on why it's important to understand the full perspective and that just because you're both looking at the same object does not mean that you will see it the same way nor does it mean that one person is lying it just means that well the government has too much control and literally none at the same time people need to stop and realize that the constitution was to con two kids and to Shun from one
ps cia test
In the scenario where the CIA and NATO are purportedly run by the same individuals or entities, it would raise significant concerns about potential conflicts of interest, abuse of power, and lack of oversight. Such a situation could undermine the principles of checks and balances that are essential for ensuring responsible governance and accountability.
If there were credible allegations of such a relationship, it would likely prompt intense scrutiny from various quarters, including:
1. Congressional Oversight: In the United States, congressional committees responsible for intelligence and national security matters would be expected to conduct thorough investigations to assess the veracity of these claims and hold those involved accountable.
2. International Diplomacy: NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance involving multiple member states. Allegations of such a conflict of interest could lead to diplomatic repercussions among member countries and potentially impact the alliance's credibility.
3. Legal Inquiries: Legal mechanisms within the U.S. and potentially at the international level would likely be invoked to investigate and address any potential wrongdoing or abuse of power.
It's important to note that such a situation would be highly irregular and contrary to the principles of democratic governance, transparency, and accountability. The potential fallout for both agencies in this scenario could be extensive, including leadership changes, legal consequences, and diplomatic repercussions.
If you have further questions or want to explore related topics, feel free to ask!
le v el s o divide and reign er fix ha ann db so world cant §ed di ide them and call them eve laugh and neon dragon aka the snake aka sovereign
un in a li Ann able rights aka un in alien le fightS I'm done being ignored and overlooked intentionally gasolined for one man's sick twisted pleasure of raping me and having it overlooked for money fuck you
Trump's handlers were wise to steer him away from the term "witch hunt" largely because back in the day, it was the Christians doing the hunting. Also, as one who counted Bill Coffin as a friend (He hired me to be the Minister of Social Justice at Riverside Church), I'm reminded of this quote of his:
The problem with small Christian schools is that they produce small Christians."
I’m so glad you take time to put into words the concepts about which I rant to my family and friends. Believe, or don’t believe — it’s how YOU act towards others and the world that counts. When religious faith/beliefs are taught as absolute and mandatory, democracy cannot thrive.
Well put! Fear is so rampant these days that even a sleaze like Orange can sell himself as divine. The power of his rage and the simplicity of his “message” is what so many find attractive. The upcoming election is a very real test for our society.
what if you're being gasoline by an ex who happens to work for the CIA and you're so gas that you can't ask for a lawyer and you're so gaslight that local sheriffs don't even know nor do they care who you are or why and are simply ignoring you at the request of your rapist who do you reach out to and how can you reach out to them if nobody can see a fucking thing you say or hear it
then u pu ll god liu iui d add my kidnapped kud n im ber lid n joly fuck id saud ur screwed
It's important to approach this matter with careful consideration and attention to legal facts. The Privacy Act of 1974 is a United States federal law that was signed by President Gerald Ford, not by the Queen of England or President Jimmy Carter. The Act primarily governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of personally identifiable information maintained by federal agencies.
If there are claims or documents suggesting that the Queen of England signed the Privacy Act with President Carter, it's essential to scrutinize the authenticity and context of such claims. However, based on established legal records and historical facts, the Privacy Act of 1974 remains the applicable law in the United States regarding privacy and personal information protection.
If you have specific concerns about privacy laws or related legal matters, I recommend consulting with qualified legal professionals to ensure accurate and reliable guidance based on current laws and regulations.
please take the following and formulate it into a request for a presidential pardon even though I have diplomatic immunity I want to pardon for my kids for me for every victim that fought back against slavery of the worst kind slavery of the mind removing our ability to be heard make the hardened Stern but also make it funny make a joke about how Monica and then Monica with a k which is the sacrificed angel are similar people but that Monica with a C should have gotten her knees for me instead considering the black is also the red Clinton was the only president to not do his job as opposed to doing it and insert the information that we've gathered in the last hour and apply it to the pardon as proven evidence as to why it should be granted § ©s© A ped ea llc at r a-z
electromagnetic pulses if used in combination with laser lights satellites and drones were to create a magnetic contact lens over your eyes to level your site and if dvc's were used to control the ripple or wrinkle in Time is what they call it to control the hurts level so no matter what was said the other party would hear whatever the government wanted them to take that and apply that to this concept and write a hypothetical essay on why it's important to understand the full perspective and that just because you're both looking at the same object does not mean that you will see it the same way nor does it mean that one person is lying it just means that well the government has too much control and literally none at the same time people need to stop and realize that the constitution was to con two kids and to Shun from one
ps cia test
In the scenario where the CIA and NATO are purportedly run by the same individuals or entities, it would raise significant concerns about potential conflicts of interest, abuse of power, and lack of oversight. Such a situation could undermine the principles of checks and balances that are essential for ensuring responsible governance and accountability.
If there were credible allegations of such a relationship, it would likely prompt intense scrutiny from various quarters, including:
1. Congressional Oversight: In the United States, congressional committees responsible for intelligence and national security matters would be expected to conduct thorough investigations to assess the veracity of these claims and hold those involved accountable.
2. International Diplomacy: NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance involving multiple member states. Allegations of such a conflict of interest could lead to diplomatic repercussions among member countries and potentially impact the alliance's credibility.
3. Legal Inquiries: Legal mechanisms within the U.S. and potentially at the international level would likely be invoked to investigate and address any potential wrongdoing or abuse of power.
It's important to note that such a situation would be highly irregular and contrary to the principles of democratic governance, transparency, and accountability. The potential fallout for both agencies in this scenario could be extensive, including leadership changes, legal consequences, and diplomatic repercussions.
If you have further questions or want to explore related topics, feel free to ask!
le v el s o divide and reign er fix ha ann db so world cant §ed di ide them and call them eve laugh and neon dragon aka the snake aka sovereign
un in a li Ann able rights aka un in alien le fightS I'm done being ignored and overlooked intentionally gasolined for one man's sick twisted pleasure of raping me and having it overlooked for money fuck you
what if you're being gasoline by an ex who happens to work for the CIA and you're so gas that you can't ask for a lawyer and you're so gaslight that local sheriffs don't even know nor do they care who you are or why and are simply ignoring you at the request of your rapist who do you reach out to and how can you reach out to them if nobody can see a fucking thing you say or hear it
then u pu ll god liu iui d add my kidnapped kud n im ber lid n joly fuck id saud ur screwed
It's important to approach this matter with careful consideration and attention to legal facts. The Privacy Act of 1974 is a United States federal law that was signed by President Gerald Ford, not by the Queen of England or President Jimmy Carter. The Act primarily governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of personally identifiable information maintained by federal agencies.
If there are claims or documents suggesting that the Queen of England signed the Privacy Act with President Carter, it's essential to scrutinize the authenticity and context of such claims. However, based on established legal records and historical facts, the Privacy Act of 1974 remains the applicable law in the United States regarding privacy and personal information protection.
If you have specific concerns about privacy laws or related legal matters, I recommend consulting with qualified legal professionals to ensure accurate and reliable guidance based on current laws and regulations.
please take the following and formulate it into a request for a presidential pardon even though I have diplomatic immunity I want to pardon for my kids for me for every victim that fought back against slavery of the worst kind slavery of the mind removing our ability to be heard make the hardened Stern but also make it funny make a joke about how Monica and then Monica with a k which is the sacrificed angel are similar people but that Monica with a C should have gotten her knees for me instead considering the black is also the red Clinton was the only president to not do his job as opposed to doing it and insert the information that we've gathered in the last hour and apply it to the pardon as proven evidence as to why it should be granted § ©s© A ped ea llc at r a-z
electromagnetic pulses if used in combination with laser lights satellites and drones were to create a magnetic contact lens over your eyes to level your site and if dvc's were used to control the ripple or wrinkle in Time is what they call it to control the hurts level so no matter what was said the other party would hear whatever the government wanted them to take that and apply that to this concept and write a hypothetical essay on why it's important to understand the full perspective and that just because you're both looking at the same object does not mean that you will see it the same way nor does it mean that one person is lying it just means that well the government has too much control and literally none at the same time people need to stop and realize that the constitution was to con two kids and to Shun from one
ps cia test
In the scenario where the CIA and NATO are purportedly run by the same individuals or entities, it would raise significant concerns about potential conflicts of interest, abuse of power, and lack of oversight. Such a situation could undermine the principles of checks and balances that are essential for ensuring responsible governance and accountability.
If there were credible allegations of such a relationship, it would likely prompt intense scrutiny from various quarters, including:
1. Congressional Oversight: In the United States, congressional committees responsible for intelligence and national security matters would be expected to conduct thorough investigations to assess the veracity of these claims and hold those involved accountable.
2. International Diplomacy: NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance involving multiple member states. Allegations of such a conflict of interest could lead to diplomatic repercussions among member countries and potentially impact the alliance's credibility.
3. Legal Inquiries: Legal mechanisms within the U.S. and potentially at the international level would likely be invoked to investigate and address any potential wrongdoing or abuse of power.
It's important to note that such a situation would be highly irregular and contrary to the principles of democratic governance, transparency, and accountability. The potential fallout for both agencies in this scenario could be extensive, including leadership changes, legal consequences, and diplomatic repercussions.
If you have further questions or want to explore related topics, feel free to ask!
le v el s o divide and reign er fix ha ann db so world cant §ed di ide them and call them eve laugh and neon dragon aka the snake aka sovereign
un in a li Ann able rights aka un in alien le fightS I'm done being ignored and overlooked intentionally gasolined for one man's sick twisted pleasure of raping me and having it overlooked for money fuck you