Tourists in the Capitol!
This was Georgia Representative Andrew Clydes’s characterization of the fine folks who visited Washington D.C. on January 6th. It might have been a tad more understandable if Clyde were a Florida Congressman. I did see some slight resemblance between the merry marauders in the Capitol and some scenes from spring break in Fort Lauderdale. But really . . .
That example of false equivalence (insurrectionists=tourists) is absurd enough that even the other deniers won’t repeat it. Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson came close when asserting that he didn’t feel “threatened” by the tourists. Had they been tourists from the Black Lives Matter region, however, he would have been mighty scared. Or Antifa, which the fascists are rightfully worried about because, well, they’re anti-fascists.
But I digress from my primary purpose.
The most breathtaking and dangerous inversion of reality comes in the nationwide campaign against diversity and inclusion programs, aka “the leftist, socialist conspiracy to indoctrinate our lovely white children into a vicious, racist, self-hating view of our completely fair, meritocratic and generous nation.”
The group Parents Defending Education has filed federal civil rights complaints against a number of school districts that discuss systemic racism. They claim the schools are thereby admitting to a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Schools and colleges discussing such things should be stripped of federal funding.
Up is down and down is up. The oppressor is the oppressed. The insurrectionists are the tourists and the mostly peaceful BLM protesters are the insurrectionists.
There are an ocean of red herrings in the arguments advanced by Parents Defending Education. They claim that little white children are made to feel guilty. I’ve been involved in many years of anti-racist work and education. I have never witnessed a child being “accused” of being an oppressor or being intentionally “made” to feel guilty. Now I don’t doubt for a second that some white children take the truth of racism to heart and feel empathy. There are many truths in history that should invite children to experience empathy.
While not wishing to craft my own false equivalence, my former school’s students heard from Holocaust survivors every year and there were no parents of non-Jewish students who complained that their children were being made to feel guilty, yet many kids sobbed uncontrollably.
No, the problem with Parents Defending Education is that they don’t believe in systemic racism. They are not (quite) the equivalent of Holocaust deniers, but they are the equivalent of those who begrudgingly accept the truth of the Holocaust, but deny the present-day reality of anti-semitism. Sure, they say, slavery was horrid, but now get over it already.
The inversion of reality is also found in opposition to affirmative action or other efforts to address systemic and historic bias. “But what about darling Chloe, who worked so hard and had HER place at Harvard taken? Isn’t poor Chloe the victim here?” The capitalization of HER is not a typo.
The problem in American education is not that white children are being exposed to the undeniable, quantifiable, verifiable truth of race and racism.
The problem is that generations of Black, indigenous and other minority children were denied the opportunity to have their lives, their experiences and their rich culture represented in their schools.
They, and I, learned that Columbus discovered America. That Indians were primitive savages that impeded white destiny. That all the great intellectuals were white men. That all great writers were white. That all the presidents and nearly all other “leaders” were white men. Until relatively recently, nearly all the characters on television or in movies were white. Every smiling face pitching success and glamor was white.
These generations of children went to underfunded, inferior schools. Their parents were unable to buy homes and worked longer hours for lower wages. They were taken to school early so their mothers could go take care of other people’s children. Their parents - fathers - were locked away for years after committing drug “crimes” that the white kids’ parents call recreation. They saw their ancestors portrayed as Aunt Jemima, Amos and Andy, minstrels or the rare athlete or musicians whom they could admire, but not, God forbid, date or marry.
It is goddamn infuriating to watch these entitled people suing schools for trying to tell the truth. Generations of families of color should be suing the schools for lying to their (and our) children for generation after generation after generation.
For myself I say, "Amen." This issue is angry, and we should be, in my estimation. We have been deprived of the opportunity to investigate and explore truths - past mistakes of our nation. Some people don't have perspective and don't want it. They don't want anyone telling them they're wrong, either, or that they've missed something. We flawed humans are compelled to comfort ourselves. True courage and strength of character comes through when people welcome different perspectives. Thanks for speaking your mind, as always. Good to have people both minds and communication skills around!
You wrote in part, "No, the problem with Parents Defending Education is that they don’t believe in systemic racism. They are not (quite) the equivalent of Holocaust deniers, but they are the equivalent of those who begrudgingly accept the truth of the Holocaust, but deny the present-day reality of anti-semitism. Sure, they say, slavery was horrid, but now get over it already."
There's a distinct difference for most American kids between learning about the Holocaust, which happened in Germany and other European countries, and the enslavement of Africans and their offspring/descendants, which happened in the United States.
Teaching the former is problematic for only a small group of extremist Holocaust denialists in the US. Few parents would publicly object, few children, if any, would come away feeling that they are directly or indirectly being asked to feel responsible for what happened to Jews and other minorities in Nazi concentration camps.
Like it or not, the same cannot be said about what quite a few people these days feel should happen with education about slavery. There's a definite push to try to impart guilt to white people. While I personally reject most of what's being purveyed in the book WHITE FRAGILITY, I've been to a few anti-racist presentations in which a few of the other white people in the audience apparently felt that they were personally being held accountable by much of what was said (I would tend to disagree with their perception, but I can only really state for certain that I didn't feel called to account).
The two subjects simply don't have the same meaning to American audiences. And to the extent that anyone is pushing an agenda that is designed to make white audiences of adults (let alone schoolchildren) feel personally responsible for slavery, it's simply off-base to compare the lessons or the two sets of historical facts and issues.
There's a lot more to this topic than whether a set of American parents (and interested adults, some of whom happen to be politicians) comprises bad people whom we should judge harshly for questioning the current trends in how American slavery and concomitant issues are taught and discussed. Reducing the conversation to good guys and bad guys is in itself part of the broader problem we continue to struggle with as a nation. And in my opinion, that's an approach that is very unlikely to improve matters.